City Planning is putting on another two Open Houses regarding new building types proposed in the Grandview-Woodland Community Plan. They seem to be the same as the Open Houses they held in January, but perhaps they will be updated.
The new Open Houses take place:
|Wednesday, March 14, 5:30 – 8:30 pm
Lord Nelson Elementary School Gym, 2235 Kitchener Street
Saturday, March 17, 12 noon – 3 pm
Hard to understand why so little notice is being given — barely 48 hours before the first one. However, if you missed the events in January, this is the chance to catch up on the unaffordable design choices they want us to accept.
On Sunday, 11th March, the Grandview Woodland Area Council (GWAC) will hold its annual general meeting at the Canucks Family Room upstairs at 1655 William, by the playground in Grandview Park. The meeting starts at 2:00pm.
GWAC is now more than fifty years old and continues to give great service to the community through its regular monthly meetings at which matters of interest to the community are discussed in an open forum, and the views of its members are regularly shared with Vancouver City Council.
It is the most democratic of organizations possible, allowing any resident of Grandview to come to the meeting and vote on the executive. Moreover, its elections take place every year so the executive is always accountable and always changing. More information about this and other meetings can be found by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
Some of the less popular people in the neighbourhood claim that, because they rarely get their way in this uniquely democratic assembly, that GWAC is a waste of time. However, a busy and popular Provincial Minister such as Shane Simpson clearly doesn’t agree with them; and I’ll take his view rather than that of the negative folks.
Come along on March 11th and add your voice in support of your residents’ Council.
Go along and tell them what you think. Here’s a couple of questions you might want to ask:
- As was so eloquently stated in the recent Throne Speech in Victoria: “When people can’t find an affordable home … safety and security is taken away …[and]… Businesses cannot grow when the skilled workers they need are shut out by the high cost of housing” How many of the 68 condos will be affordable (by CMHC definition) to Vancouver families earning median incomes (as defined by Stats Can) using government-regulated minimum down payments?
- How will you guarantee that all purchasers of the 68 condos are tax-paying Canadian residents?
I’m sure you can think of others.
In the last few weeks, I have reported on the raid on Fet’s Whiskey Kitchen and followed up with an article concerning the reasons behind the raid. Eric Fergie of Fet’s has now issued his own statement:
“With a stroke of her pen Premier Notley has taken away from the people of her province their right to choose what products to buy. This arbitrary political decision to restrict imports penalizes both the people who have worked so hard to create British Columbia’s world class wine industry and Albertans by restricting consumer choice. This restriction of consumer choice will surely cause tremendous financial hardship to both Alberta and British Columbia business owners and their employees.
Domestically, British Columbia’s hospitality industry is in a similar predicament. The Liquor Control and Licensing Branch has arbitrarily restricted the ability of restaurants and bars to purchase the full range of products they wish to carry by forcing them to purchase all liquor product only from the limited stock of the B.C. Liquor Distribution Branch retail stores. Our province has an incredible world class dining scene, but our drinks and cocktail programs suffer due to this archaic policy of restricting choice. We have never been given a proper and mindful answer for this policy.
In order for our restaurants and bars to compete on a world class level we need choice. The current model does not allow for our industry to compete globally due to lack of choice and availability. Import agents in our province import a vast array of world class products and ingredients but most are not available for purchase by our bars and restaurants.
In reaction to recent events and in fear of government enforcement, restauranteurs and bartenders across the province are scrambling to remove beer, wine, and spirits from their shelves and menus that were bought from provincially licensed private retailers. The hospitality industry purchases products from private stores because those stores offer access to a broad selection of specialty products not carried by the Liquor Distribution Branch, and available in quantities less than a full case. Our industry’s sophisticated customers demand quality and choice and, as a result of the liquor control branch’s arbitrary policy, the hospitality industry is struggling to provide that choice.
The restriction placed on licensee to licensee sales is not enshrined in law. Rather, it is entirely created by a policy of the liquor control and licensing branch. This is a policy that can be changed today with the stroke of a pen, giving all British Columbians the right to choose. Such a change could even help our beleaguered wine industry as smaller establishments will not be required to purchase BC wines by the case, but could purchase smaller quantities from private stores. We anticipate that some may argue that a restaurant or bar “can order the products through the government store”. It is possible to order some specialty products through government stores, but they must be ordered by the case and government stores cannot process orders above a certain size. Moreover, it can take weeks for specialty products to arrive, not to mention the incredible cost of inventory. As an example, over 2 weeks ago we ordered a case of whisky that is readily available in the warehouse and at private retailers. That same product is not currently available at government stores and the ordering process is extremely delayed (and we often end up with the wrong product in the end). How can any business operate this way?
To highlight the arbitrariness of this policy, we point to another, contradictory, liquor control branch policy. Our guests are allowed to bring their own wine into our licensed establishments, pay a corkage fee, and have our staff serve the liquor to them. What’s strange about this policy is that the wine can come from anywhere in the world with no provincial taxes paid. On the other hand, licensed establishments can only sell products purchased from government liquor stores. There is no policy rationale that can legitimately connect these two contradictory policies.
Two weeks ago, we sent the attached letter Good data and fair taxation on RE v1-1 and cc’d, at his request, our MLA Shane Simpson. We have yet to hear a reply from either party or their staff. Thus, we felt it was time to share this letter with the rest of the Members of British Columbia’s Legislative Assembly. There is no intent to embarrass our MLA or the Attorney General, but this issue needs to be addressed. We understand that these are busy times in government but this pressing issue negatively affects an entire business sector and puts jobs at risk.
Because the policy restricting licensee to licensee sales is not required by law, with a stroke of a pen our government can provide choice for all consumers.
The right to choose freely within a marketplace is enshrined in our society and culture. No one person or government should have the power to impede that right for purely arbitrary reasons. Please read the attached letter. It’s time for an open an honest discussion about choice. At the very least British Columbian’s deserve an answer to this simple question: why can’t bars and restaurants in our province buy from licensed retailers?”