Remaking The Poverty Industry of DTES

In my opinion, one of the major issues in DTES (especially but not exclusively) is the “industry” that has developed around the issue of poverty, homelessness, and addiction.  There are scores of organizations of all kinds, many with overlapping aims, and each with their own bureaucracies (small and large), a number of which are very highly paid.  Too much money that could be better spent on support and maintenance is drained into paying for the organizations and their “mini-empires”.  

While there may be a few outstanding success stories, it is plain to see that this poverty industry as currently operating has failed spectacularly and horrifically.

I do not have a magic answer to solve these issues. Rather, I would propose that a working conference be established including as many interested groups as possible to come up with new solutions. The conferees should include, but not be limited to, the homeless, the working poor, VANDU and similar groups, community groups, women’s groups, indigenous folks, social and health professionals. The conference needs to include all levels of government but not be controlled or managed by them. The governments should, within reasonable limits, agree to enact the recommendations proposed by the conference.

I have some suggestions about matters that could be included in the discussion (I am sure there are many others):

  • decriminalization of drugs and provide a safe supply, thus removing police and criminals from what is a social welfare and health issue;
  • bring in Universal Basic Income;
  • expropriate all SROs and similar facilities (including those operated by non-profits) and turn them into clean and safe livable spaces under transparent management;
  • prioritize the building of affordable housing in the neighbourhood;
  • significantly reform and improve health, welfare, education, and training services;
  • funding should come from the money currently paid to the poverty industry, plus a reduction in police budgets by x%, and more if needed.

None of this would be cheap. But if you think the present situation is affordable for any of us, then frankly you are nuts.

4 Responses to Remaking The Poverty Industry of DTES

  1. pennystreet546 says:

    Really good list of topics, Jak. And I agree wholeheartedly. One thing I would add would be a really effective 9-1-1 response to mental health situations that doesn’t mean that armed police attend. I’ve heard (but don’t have any statistics at hand) that a huge percentage of police calls involved mental health crises. I’d also like to know how people with mental health concerns in the DTES would feel about creating some sort of residential safe/comfortable place for people in mental health distress can stay for as long as they need the support — like Riverview might have been, a beautiful place with kind/compassionate staff.

  2. nathanarticulated says:

    UBI goes together with UBM and Free Transit.

  3. pennystreet546 says:

    What are UBI and UBM?

    • jakking says:

      UBI is Universal Basic Income. Not heard of UBM but as it is Nathan making the comment I assumed it to mean something like Universal Basic Movement (i.e. free transit)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: